|
Read in: Español
Contact Information
Video Click here to preview
our videos New
York Brasilia Ms.
María Amparo Lasso London Geneva
Brussels
Copenhagen Washington Cairo Bratislava
Moscow Bangkok
New
Delhi Tokyo 27 November 2007 Climate change threatens unprecedented human development reversals
From left to right, Marisa Leticia Lula da Silva, wife of the Brazilian President; Kevin Watkins, Director of the
Human Development Report; Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of Brazil and Kemal Dervis, Administrator of UNDP, Leire Pajín,
Spanish Secretary of State for International Cooperation The report, "Fighting climate change:
Human solidarity in a divided world", provides a stark account of the threat posed by global warming. It argues that
the world is drifting towards a “tipping point” that could lock the world’s poorest countries and their poorest citizens in
a downward spiral, leaving hundreds of millions facing malnutrition, water scarcity, ecological threats, and a loss of livelihoods. “Ultimately,
climate change is a threat to humanity as a whole. But it is the poor, a constituency with no responsibility for the ecological
debt we are running up, who face the immediate and most severe human costs,” commented UNDP Administrator Kemal Derviş.
The report comes at a key moment in negotiations to forge a multilateral agreement for the period after 2012—the expiry
date for the current commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol. It calls for a “twin track” approach that combines stringent
mitigation to limit 21st Century warming to less than 2°C (3.6°F), with strengthened international cooperation on adaptation. On
mitigation, the authors call on developed countries to demonstrate leadership by cutting greenhouse gas emissions by at least
80% of 1990 levels by 2050. The report advocates a mix of carbon taxation, more stringent cap-and-trade programmes, energy
regulation, and international cooperation on financing for low-carbon technology transfer. Turning to adaptation, the
report warns that inequalities in ability to cope with climate change are emerging as an increasingly powerful driver of wider
inequalities between and within countries. It calls on rich countries to put climate change adaptation at the centre of international
partnerships on poverty reduction. “We are issuing a call to action, not providing a counsel of despair,” commented
lead author Kevin Watkins, adding, “Working together with resolve, we can win the battle against climate change. Allowing
the window of opportunity to close would represent a moral and political failure without precedent in human history.” He described
the Bali talks as a unique opportunity to put the interests of the world’s poor at the heart of climate change negotiations.
The report provides evidence of the mechanisms through with the ecological impacts of climate change will be transmitted
to the poor. Focusing on the 2.6 billion people surviving on less than US$2 a day, the authors warn forces unleashed by global
warming could stall and then reverse progress built up over generations. Among the threats to human development identified
by Fighting climate change: - The breakdown of agricultural systems as a result of increased exposure to drought,
rising temperatures, and more erratic rainfall, leaving up to 600 million more people facing malnutrition. Semi-arid areas
of sub-Saharan Africa with some of the highest concentrations of poverty in the world face the danger of potential productivity
losses of 26% by 2060. “For millions of people, these are events that offer a one-way
ticket to poverty and long-run cycles of disadvantage,” says the report. Apart from threatening lives and inflicting suffering,
they wipe out assets, lead to malnutrition, and result in children being withdrawn from school. In Ethiopia, the report finds
that children exposed to a drought in early childhood are 36% more likely to be malnourished—a figure that translates into
2 million additional cases of child malnutrition. While the report focuses on the immediate threats to the world’s
poor, it warns that failure to tackle climate change could leave future generations facing ecological catastrophe. It highlights
the possible collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheets, the retreat of glaciers, and the stress on marine ecosystems as systemic
threats to humanity. “Of course there are uncertainties, but faced with risks of this order of magnitude uncertainty
is not a case for inaction. Ambitious mitigation is in fact the insurance we have to buy against potentially very large risks.
Fighting climate change is about our commitment to human development today and about creating a world that will provide ecological
security for our children and their grandchildren,” Mr. Derviş said. Avoiding dangerous climate change Drawing
on a new climate model, the report suggests a ‘21st Century carbon budget’ for staying within this threshold. The budget quantifies
the total level of greenhouse gas emissions consistent with this goal. In an exercise that captures the scale of the challenge
ahead, the report estimates that business-as-usual could result on current trends in the entire carbon budget for the 21st
Century being exhausted by 2032. The authors warn that on current trends the world is more likely to breach a 4°C threshold
than stay within 2°C (3.6°F). The Human Development Report addresses some of the critical issues facing negotiators
in Bali. While acknowledging the threat posed by rising emissions from major developing countries, the authors argue that
northern governments have to initiate the deepest and earliest cuts. They point out that rich countries carry overwhelming
historic responsibility for the problem, have far deeper carbon footprints, and have the financial and technological capabilities
to act. “If people in the developing world had generated per capita CO2 emissions at the same level as people in North
America, we would need the atmosphere of nine planets to deal with the consequences,” commented Mr. Watkins. Using
an illustrative framework for an emissions pathway consistent with avoiding dangerous climate change, the Human Development
Report suggests that: - Developed countries should cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 80% to 2050 and 30% by 2020
from 1990 levels. Measured against this benchmark, the authors find that many of the targets set by developed country governments
fall short of what is required. It notes also that most developed countries have failed to achieve even the modest reductions—averaging
around 5% from 1990 levels—agreed under the Kyoto Protocol. Even where ambitious targets have been set, the report argues,
few developed countries have aligned stated climate security goals with concrete energy policies. Scenarios for future
emissions reinforce the scale of the challenge ahead. On current trends, CO2 emissions are projected to increase by 50% to
2030—an outcome that would make dangerous climate change inevitable. “The bottom line is that the global energy system is
out of alignment with the ecological systems that sustain our planet,” commented Mr. Watkins, adding: “realignment will take
a fundamental shift in regulation, market incentives, and international cooperation.” Fighting climate change identifies
a range of policies needed to close the gap between climate security statements and energy policies for avoiding dangerous
climate change. Among the most important: - Pricing carbon. The report argues that both carbon taxation and cap-and-trade
schemes have a role to play. Gradually rising carbon taxes would be a powerful tool to change incentive structures facing
investors. It also stresses that carbon taxes need not imply an overall greater tax burden because they could be compensated
by tax reductions on labour income. - Stronger regulatory standards. The report calls on governments to adopt and
enforce tougher standards on vehicle emissions, buildings and electrical appliances. - Supporting the development
of low carbon energy provision. The report highlights the unexploited potential for an increase in the share of renewable
energy used, and for breakthrough technologies such as carbon capture and storage (CCS). - International cooperation
on finance and technology transfer. The authors note that developing countries will not participate in an agreement that provides
no incentives for entry, and which threatens to raise the costs of energy. The report argues for the creation of a Climate
Change Mitigation Facility (CCMF) to provide $25-50 billion annually in financing the incremental low-carbon energy investments
in developing countries consistent with achieving shared climate change goals. Drawing on economic modeling work, the
Human Development Report argues that the cost of stabilizing greenhouse gases at 450 parts per million (ppm) could be limited
to an average to 1.6% of world GDP to 2030. “While these are real costs, the costs of inaction will be far greater, whether
measured in economic, social or human terms,” warned Mr. Derviş. The report points out that the cost of avoiding dangerous
climate change represents less than two-thirds of current world military spending. Adaptation efforts overlooked The report draws attention
to extreme inequalities in adaptation capacity. Rich countries are investing heavily in climate-change defence systems, with
governments playing a leading role. By contrast, in developing countries “people are being left to sink or swim with their
own resources,” writes Desmond Tutu, Archbishop Emeritus of Cape Town, in the report, creating a “world of ‘adaptation apartheid’.”
“Nobody wants to understate the very real long-term ecological challenges that climate change will bring to rich countries,”
Mr. Watkins commented. “But the near term vulnerabilities are not concentrated in lower Manhattan and London, but in flood
prone areas of Bangladesh and drought prone parts of sub-Saharan Africa.” The Human Development Report shows that international
cooperation on adaptation has been slow to materialize. According to the report, total current spending through multilateral
mechanisms on adaptation has amounted to $26 million to date—roughly one week’s worth of spending on UK flood defences. Current
mechanisms are delivering small amounts of finance with high transaction costs, the authors say. The report
argues for reforms including: - Additional financing for climate proofing infrastructure and building resilience,
with northern governments allocating at least $86 billion annually by 2015 (around 0.2% of their projected GDP). Fighting climate change concludes that “one of the
hardest lessons taught by climate change is that the historically carbon intensive growth, and the profligate consumption
in rich nations that has accompanied it, is ecologically unsustainable.” But the authors argue, “with the right reforms, it
is not too late to cut greenhouse gas emissions to sustainable levels without sacrificing economic growth: rising prosperity
and climate security are not conflicting objectives.” Related files
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||